Skip Navigation



Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education Advance Access published online on March 27, 2008

The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, doi:10.1093/deafed/enn003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/3/391    most recent
enn003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burnham, D.
Right arrow Articles by Varley, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burnham, D.
Right arrow Articles by Varley, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Parameters in Television Captioning for Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing Adults: Effects of Caption Rate Versus Text Reduction on Comprehension

Denis Burnham

MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney

Greg Leigh

Royal Institute for Deaf and Blind Children and University of Newcastle

William Noble

University of New England

Caroline Jones

MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, and University of Wollongong

Michael Tyler and Leonid Grebennikov

MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney

Alex Varley

Media Access Australia


   Abstract

Caption rate and text reduction are factors that appear to affect the comprehension of captions by people who are deaf or hard of hearing. These 2 factors are confounded in everyday captioning; rate (in words per minute) is slowed by text reduction. In this study, caption rate and text reduction were manipulated independently in 2 experiments to assess any differential effects and possible benefits for comprehension by deaf and hard-of-hearing adults. Volunteers for the study included adults with a range of reading levels, self-reported hearing status, and different communication and language preferences. Results indicate that caption rate (at 130, 180, 230 words per minute) and text reduction (at 84%, 92%, and 100% original text) have different effects for different adult users, depending on hearing status, age, and reading level. In particular, reading level emerges as a dominant factor: more proficient readers show better comprehension than poor readers and are better able to benefit from caption rate and, to some extent, text reduction modifications.

Correspondence should be sent to Denis Burnham, MARCS Auditory Laboratories, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, New South Wales 1797, Australia (e-mail: d.burnham{at}uws.edu.au).

Received November 10, 2007; revised January 30, 2008; accepted January 30, 2008


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.